People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries
As far as I am concerned, there are more benefits for people to travel in their own country because it is more convenient and its expenses are lower. In the following paragraphs, I will pinpoint my case.
The first reason worth mentioning is that it is more comfortable and easy for people to travel in their own country. Each country has a unique and official language that most people use. As a result, people that live in a country can communicate and interact without any difficulty. It is plausible that different languages are used in a country, but residents can understand and speak the official language. However, traveling abroad is more complex and complicated since travelers are obliged to learn or even understand the language of that country a little bit, and because of it, communication will become arduous for people. For instance, my friend went on travel domestically and since the language of that place was his native language, he learned about their culture and customs. But his latest experience on the trip to France was arduous for him. Although he had a basic knowledge of the English language, most people speak French, and he could not socialize with other people, which made him miserable.
A further more subtle point is that it does not require a lot of money and it's cheaper. In recent years, since oil price has increased, tickets for airplanes have become very expensive, which many people cannot afford. Also, our country's currency has lesser value in comparison to other countries which makes the option of traveling abroad impossible. Nevertheless, traveling inside our country does not need a lot of money, and if people could not buy a ticket for an airplane, they could use their car or even rent a vehicle. In this way, travelers could decline their expenses and save their money for better costs such as interesting activities or buying gifts. Moreover, Most people enjoy driving a car in comparison to using fast transportation systems such as airplanes or trains. They could enjoy the environment, take a break whenever they wanted, or even visit beautiful places they encountered along the way. For these kinds of people, the duration of airplane travel is extremely tiresome and they get bored quickly, cannot enjoy the trip, and consider it a waste of time.
To make a long story short, based on the arguments mentioned above, there are more advantages for people to travel inside their own country due to ease in traveling inside the country and lower cost and expenses.
- The extended family is less important now than it was in the past 70
- A/D: “Working at home using computers or telephones is better than working in the office.” 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past. 73
- TPO 7 Ecocertification for wood companies 76
- TPO42 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...derstand the language of that country a little bit, and because of it, communication will ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people, which made him miserable. A further more subtle point is that it d...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63748438392 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527058823529 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0303345446 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.947368421 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3684210526 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346664292473 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114305265768 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11200033533 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269184447522 0.150856017488 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601533614287 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.