Farming is the backbone of every country but nowadays many youngsters hesitate to enter in this profession. Why is this the case and what can be done to avoid it?
Evidence suggests that farming-related careers, which are the linchpin of every nation, do not pique most young people’s interests nowadays. While there could exist some root causes behind this fact, this essay will outline some promising solutions to improve the situation.
To begin with, there might be two reasons why many youngsters are doubtful to start working in the agriculture industry. First and foremost, high-tech machinery equipment abounds in each country in today’s contemporary era. This simply means the benefits of these agricultural machines could easily surpass the need for human labor. Therefore, an apparent lack of job prospects would appear, and in turn, younger citizens show no interest in this field. Second, for becoming a full-fledged and legible job candidate in farming, it would take a prolonged period of academic years spent in educational centers. Thus, these young people decide not to be qualification seekers at universities, and instead enter the job market to make money, probably in a field that yields results faster.
Despite this, governments can ameliorate the status quo by adopting better policies. The first suggestion would center around investing more funding in creating new job opportunities for the youth in farming. The most salient illustration in this respect could be forcing the senior managers of farming companies, whether private or state ones, to hire more young job seekers at the expense of providing companies with financial incentives. Another sound resolution could be shortening the length of formal education of the ones who desire to enter this field. In this way, they become more interested due to not having to wait so long to finish their course, and then be hired.
In conclusion, although agriculture is considered to be the linchpin of every country across the world, lack of jobs because of the advent of new technological machines in farming, as well as lengthy courses to train future workers would make younger population turn back in this field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-20 | mahyarr | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-14 | soji_kab@hotmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-22 | elham mousavi | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-20 | Unnati | 87 | view |
| 2021-04-12 | Shwatank | 78 | view |
- Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources such as forests animals or clean water Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 89
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the danger of committing a crime To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Write a letter to your manager about a computer system problem that you have encountered and say Describe the problem How it is affecting your work What needs to be done about it
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in British over the same time period 89
- Some people prefer to plan activities for their free time very carefully Others choose not to make any plans at all for free time Compare the benefits of planning free time activities with the benefits of not making plans Which do you prefer Planning or n 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33229813665 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78000966965 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655279503106 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3892904619 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.642857143 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231142740065 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742813415289 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423400478315 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134202855898 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234907851777 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.