The director of the International Health Foundation recently released this announcement:
“A new medical test that allows the early detection of a particular disease will prevent the deaths of people all over the world who would otherwise die from the disease. The test has been extremely effective in allowing doctors to diagnose the disease six months to a year before it would have been spotted by conventional means. As soon as we can institute this test as routine procedure in hospitals around the world, the death rate from this disease will plummet.”
The argument that the new medical test will prevent deaths that would have occurred in the past is not entirely logically convincing since it ignores certain crucial assumptions.
First, the argument assumes that early detection of the disease will lead to an immediate drop in the mortality rate from this disease, yet it does nothing to explain how this will happen, and so on.
Second, the argument never addresses the point that the existence of this new test, even if totally effective, is not the same as the widespread use of the test, and so on.
Finally, even supposing the ability of early detection to save lives and the widespread use of the test, the argument still depends on the doctors’ correct interpretation of the test and the patients’ willingness to undergo treatment, and so on.
Thus, the argument is not completely sound. The evidence in support of the conclusion that the test will cause death rates to plummet does little to prove that conclusion, since it does not address the assumptions already raised. Ultimately, the argument might have been strengthened if the author could have shown that the disease responds to early treatment, which can be enacted immediately upon receipt of the test results, that the test will be widely available around the world, and that doctors and patients will make proper use of the test
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-23 | Mateo Chen | 60 | view |
| 2022-11-02 | John7A7 | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-12 | Abdulhafeez | 66 | view |
| 2021-12-22 | Abdulhafeez | 52 | view |
| 2021-07-21 | tolubakare | 60 | view |
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 83
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 50
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 60
- The market for the luxury goods industry is on the decline Recent reports show that a higher unemployment rate coupled with consumer fears has decreased the amount of money the average household spends on both essential and nonessential items but especial 53
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 50
Comments
e-rater score report
flaws:
No. of Words: 227 350
Minimum 250 words wanted
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 15
No. of Words: 227 350
No. of Characters: 1095 1500
No. of Different Words: 114 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.882 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.824 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.521 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 72 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 63 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 37 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 32.429 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.883 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.512 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.823 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.141 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, so, still, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.6327345309 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 28.8173652695 52% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 55.5748502994 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 2260.96107784 50% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 227.0 441.139720559 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01762114537 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.56307096286 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6276785275 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 204.123752495 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528634361233 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 705.55239521 49% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.67365269461 299% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 19.7664670659 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.8473053892 140% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.2462270395 57.8364921388 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.714285714 119.503703932 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4285714286 23.324526521 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.70786347227 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219635128772 0.218282227539 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100246031385 0.0743258471296 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560606242643 0.0701772020484 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128489242887 0.128457276422 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376191189644 0.0628817314937 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 14.3799401198 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 48.3550499002 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 98.500998004 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.1389221557 133% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.