Some people believe that to be successful at a sport you need a natural ability and others think that hard work and practice can make you successful. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
These days, as sports become famous among commoners, thoughts and attitudes towards athletics have been changing over time. Some people argue that the victory of athletes comes straight from their genes, while others claim that it is directly proportionate to their strong will to overcome potential hurdles. In this essay, I will analyze both sides of the perceptions and my personal conviction will also be appended at the end.
To begin with, the inborn talent might be a huge advantage for a sportsman to become victorious without much dedicated effort. Those who are gifted with such unique genetic makeup as longer legs or remarkable eyesight would be able to obtain their highest performance in a particular sports field, even if they do not perform the intense practice. Take the Kenyan people as an example. Kenyans who live at a high altitude, possess more red blood cells, which make them to keep invincible stamina, and this could lead them to be the fastest runners in the world. However, it would still contribute to the risk of being indolent and less motivated.
On the other hand, a sportsperson who lacks adequate training, techniques, and a strong inclination to win a match, could not be a triumphant champion, however, they are born with natural aptitude. It is not their instinct, which induces them to be on the top of the rank. Above all, their distinct mindset and motive against the competition is the most momentous trigger which brings them the championship in a neck-to-neck competition. Nevertheless, it is undeniable that those who are deficient in the inborn ability, require more travails and fierce training than those with skills.
To sum up, if it is to say that the natural ability is the reason behind the victory of a competitor, then the assiduous persistence and powerful tendency to win the tournament polish that ability to be a master in the game. Likewise, I consider that it is acknowledgeable that they are complementary to each other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-26 | Coral Soe | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-26 | Soe Thandar Aung | 90 | view |
- Some people from poor and rural backgrounds find it difficult to get a university education Universities should make it easier for such groups to enroll To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugars which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that to be successful at a sport you need a natural ability and others think that hard work and practice can make you successful Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of being indolent and less motivated. On the other hand, a sportsperson who la...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, still, then, while, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01812688822 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79938018532 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610271903323 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7653622097 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.642857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127101725102 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402652716642 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0239377873614 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0758662921422 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195962439849 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.