in a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities other believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport
It is believed by few individuals that for the fast trains which construct in cities it is must to spend hefty amount of money on railway lines whereas other believe that money should merely spent on ameliorates public transport. I will articulate the both views along with my perspective.
To commence with, there are several reasons why individuals believe that if the amount of some spend on constructing new railway lines. First and foremost reason is that economy growth. In other words, when railway lines constructed by government then people can easily travel from one place to another without any problems. Secondly, when a railway lines built in the city's then it put good effects on city's economy. For example, in the United States mostly metro lines built in the cities for the people as a result individual can easily do their work on time.
On the other hand, other individual think that built railway lines in cities with huge amount of money totally waste of money and time because they think that public transport is major which constructing by individuals. To exemplify, public transport places are necessary to clean and modifying for people. For example, the public transport of India every year cleaned and modifying by 1 lakh volunteers . As a result, all type of people easily travel from one destination to other place.
To recapitulate, althoughlarge amount of money spent on railway lines yet I believe that public transport also important for public and places so government should spend large amount of sums on public transportation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- The line graph shows the household recycling rate in the three countries from 2005 to 2015 50
- The diagram below show how orange juice is produced 78
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town
- More and more children in developed countries is becoming overweight discuss the causes and solution 56
- Nowadays many jobs are more stressful and the working day is longer what are the reasons for this what can employers do to help employees 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
... trains which construct in cities it is must to spend hefty amount of money on railway ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'spend'
Suggestion: spend
... other believe that money should merely spent on ameliorates public transport. I will...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...remost reason is that economy growth. In other words, when railway lines construc...
^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...eaned and modifying by 1 lakh volunteers . As a result, all type of people easily ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08527131783 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6703747766 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527131782946 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3586503052 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458307584202 0.244688304435 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154127465451 0.084324248473 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129266241129 0.0667982634062 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30086593674 0.151304729494 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602568824371 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.