Task 2 In many countries today, people buy a range of household goods (TV, microwave, oven and rice cookers). Is it a positive or negative development?
An increasing number of people in buying to electronic products which are convenient for their household chores. In my opinion, this is a positive development and I will give my supportive viewpoints in the essay below.
By being interested in household products, people have improved significantly their life quality. Actually, electronic products have numerous useful functions supporting people to do their daily housework more quickly. For instance, the air fryer has been known as a new trend in recent years because it can replace oven in baking and fry food without using cooking oil. Therefore, people can reduce the amount of bad fats and having healthier meals. Another example is the nut milk maker which allow housewifes make homemade nut milk such as soya, almond or walnut milk instead of buying expensive products at stores.
Not only does the demand for household appliances improve human life quality but also contributes to enhance the development of technology. After being aware of the needs for having a more convenient life, electronic companies have researched new technology and introduced the high-tech products to customers. One clear example is the evolution of television. From the first black and white televisions in the past century, they have been improved to color televisions then flat screen televisions and they can access to internet like computers nowadays. Secondly, from the financial point of view, a rise in demand for household goods is likely to push up price of products; hence, it benefits businesses and boost economic growth of many countries.
To sum up, buying several household products will have beneficial effects on human life, the technology and the economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-02 | phuongchi17899 | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-02 | phuongchi17899 | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-02 | phuongchi17899 | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-02 | phuongchi17899 | 56 | view |
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 73
- Task 1 The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 73
- The table below shows the result of surveys in 2005 2010 and 2015 about McGill University Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- A flow chart shows the process of processing wool into cloth Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: NUT_NOT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'not'?
Suggestion: not
...healthier meals. Another example is the nut milk maker which allow housewifes make ...
^^^
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: NUT_NOT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'not'?
Suggestion: not
...er which allow housewifes make homemade nut milk such as soya, almond or walnut mil...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33455882353 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77465892648 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628676470588 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1344705611 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.615384615 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128164965168 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467498790927 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352689705061 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856300642202 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285920727457 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.