To a certain extent I agree that we do not need to watch live entertainment performances, since we can watch online. However, I also think that watching live gives us other pleasures.
There are several reasons why I believe that browsing online is useful. Firstly, people watching online do not waste their money on acquiring expansive tickets or some people cannot afford to go to another country to see the favorite singer. Furthermore, somd singer do not sing in live, so people prefer to watch via the Internet. Secondly, elderly and sick people are better off watching on TV or on the phone than at crowded football matches or concerts, so that their health does not deteriorate.
In spite of this, people are still interested in a live audience, especially teenagers who like a noisy atmosphere and want to see a person who inspires them, such as football players, actors or singers. People who like to watch live get a lot of energy and inspiration, moreover, they have opportunity to support their favorive person and can take pictures or get a signature from these stars.
In conclusion, while we undoubtedly used to watching online, however not completely. I think singers should do more to try and involve real fans, otherwise, everyone will only watch online.
To a certain extent I agree that we do not need to watch live entertainment performances, since we can watch online. However, I also think that watching live gives us other pleasures.
There are several reasons why I believe that browsing online is useful. Firstly, people watching online do not waste their money on acquiring expansive tickets or some people cannot afford to go to another country to see the favorite singer. Furthermore, somd singer do not sing in live, so people prefer to watch via the Internet. Secondly, elderly and sick people are better off watching on TV or on the phone than at crowded football matches or concerts, so that their health does not deteriorate.
In spite of this, people are still interested in a live audience, especially teenagers who like a noisy atmosphere and want to see a person who inspires them, such as football players, actors or singers. People who like to watch live get a lot of energy and inspiration, moreover, they have opportunity to support their favorive person and can take pictures or get a signature from these stars.
In conclusion, while we undoubtedly used to watching online, however not completely. I think singers should do more to try and involve real fans, otherwise, everyone will only watch online.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-27 | Farhod2004 | 56 | view |
- To a certain extent I agree that we do not need to watch live entertainment performances since we can watch online However I also think that watching live gives us other pleasures There are several reasons why I believe that browsing online is useful Firs 56
- The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992 11
- The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992 84
- More people are shopping online today than ever before Why do people choose to shop this way Are there any disadvantages to shopping online 73
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...tely. I think singers should do more to try and involve real fans, otherwise, everyone ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 1615.20841683 66% => OK
No of words: 215.0 315.596192385 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96279069767 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72468435115 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.641860465116 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 506.74238477 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9693781868 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.7 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4 7.06120827912 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.463788320731 0.244688304435 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197334039602 0.084324248473 234% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153705825167 0.0667982634062 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289655503673 0.151304729494 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.21033881218 0.056905535591 370% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.