The charts below show the average working hours of full-time workers and part-time workers in three countries and a comparison with the European average. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The tables illustrate the average number of hours worked by full-time and part-time workers in three countries of Europe compared with the average data of European for 2002.
In general, the average working hours of male workers was higher than that of females. It was immuatably true that Greece was the country requiring the highest working hours.
In 2002, the average number of hours worked by full-time workers in Greece was 39.9 with females and 42.2 with males. Meanwhile, Netherland came in the second with the data of both sexes was 38.0. The country which citizens required the lowest working hours was UK with the average working hours of female workers was 37 and that of males was 37.5. It could be manifest from the tables that the data of UK was lower than the average working hours in Europe which was 39.2 and 40.4 respectively.
The average number of hours worked by part-time workers in Europe was 34 and 32 for women and men which was higher than the data of three given countries in the region. The figure of part-time workers in Greece and UK saw the similar feature with the average working hours for full-time workers which men were required working harder than women. In contrast, Netherland was the only objects in three given countries allowing male part-time workers working 0.9 hours less than females.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-15 | phuongchi17899 | 82 | view |
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
- Children do not respect their parents and teachers as much as they did in the past This behaviour is now having a negative impact on society Discuss 89
- The table below shows the result of surveys in 2005 2010 and 2015 about McGill University Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
- In recent times economic growth has helped many become richer both in developed and developing countries However those in developed countries are not as happy as they were in the past Why is this What can be learned from this 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88157894737 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2636805802 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.381578947368 0.547539520022 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.6551174196 43.030603864 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 139.125 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360043810631 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.240111082058 0.103423049105 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112353647386 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292061632143 0.15604864568 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113938169986 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.