Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is uncertain to define the future. Some argue that people living in 21st century are more dependent on technology and innovation, and notion that in next two decades number of car will be proliferate. They cite cars are confy, easier to travel auto device and more time saver, so people will be demand more than contemporary period. However, I strongly disagree with these people and believe that there will be dramatically decline in cars in future. I will support my view point with two reasons.
To begin with, big impovement in public transportation will help to contribution to reduce in the number of cars in upcoming days. A particular reason for this circumstances is it has been always blamed for car emissions and main causes of envirinmental hazards such as air pollution and global warming. For instance, many research and articles published the article about cars is one of major contributor to emits various noxious gases such as carbon dioxide, suplhur dioxide which causes depletion of ozen layers and so forth.Moreover, many experts believe that to control the car emissions every nation should increased a number of subways and public transportation such as cable car, metro which runs through the electricity. Moreover, the population of earth is already reached to 8 billion, so due to lack of public car parks and space people will prefer to shift towards public transpottation to avoid the traffic congestion. It is important to impovement of public subways to overcome environmental hazards and traffic congestion in future. Thus, there will be more public transportation in than now in next couple of decades.
Furthermore, there is potential of fuel crisis in future. An obvious reason is that gas, petrol are an exhaustible resources, which will be extinction from world in few decades. The prices of petrol is skyrocketing day by day. It is already sign of decreasing in the cars numbers in future. Moreover, people are now concern for environmental protection and looking forward for alternative approaches. . For examples, Pairs and many European countries has already expanding cycle lane for citizens, so we can predict that the numbers of auto will be decline in future. Thus, there is huge chance of fuel crisis in upcoming years.
Kranti
Kranti Kadel
To sum up, the issue of whether numbers of cars increased or decline in next few decades is complex. Some have suggested that their number will be increased as their demand is increasing day by day due to it's luxury features and convenient. Nevertheless, I still contend that cars number will be decrease significantly in future because of it's toxic gases emits out from it which directly impact on environment, and traffic congestion in future encouraging to shift on public transportation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-11 | theprasad | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | Mangiring Pandapotan | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-05 | daddy | 70 | view |
- When Stanley Park first opened it was the largest most heavily used public park in town It is still the largest park but it is no longer heavily used Video cameras mounted in the park s parking lots last month revealed the park s drop in popularity the re 60
- The following appeared in a memo from the president of Bower Builders a company that constructs new homes A nationwide survey reveals that the two most desired home features are a large family room and a large well appointed kitchen A number of homes in o 16
- Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Students should memorize the fact only after they have studied the idea trends and concepts that help explain these facts Students who have learned only facts have learned only little 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 444, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...re will be dramatically decline in cars in future. I will support my view point with two ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... upcoming days. A particular reason for this circumstances is it has been always bla...
^^^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...s depletion of ozen layers and so forth.Moreover, many experts believe that to control t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elieve that to control the car emissions every nation should increased a number o...
^^
Line 3, column 732, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...tro which runs through the electricity. Moreover, the population of earth is already rea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1040, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...onmental hazards and traffic congestion in future. Thus, there will be more public transp...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... next couple of decades. Furthermore, there is potential of fuel crisis in fut...
^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ore, there is potential of fuel crisis in future. An obvious reason is that gas, petrol ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'resource'?
Suggestion: resource
... is that gas, petrol are an exhaustible resources, which will be extinction from world in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...ld in few decades. The prices of petrol is skyrocketing day by day. It is already ...
^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... sign of decreasing in the cars numbers in future. Moreover, people are now concern for e...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ing forward for alternative approaches. . For examples, Pairs and many European c...
^
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...hat the numbers of auto will be decline in future. Thus, there is huge chance of fuel cri...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: Kranti
...ance of fuel crisis in upcoming years. Kranti Kranti Kadel To sum up, the issue of whether ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2337.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13626373626 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93022422818 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503296703297 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 730.8 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.9191959528 48.9658058833 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.285714286 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 5.5376344086 253% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153182807761 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506368190502 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446215419995 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101686578341 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456343213358 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.