In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
Digesting such a great amount of junk food undoubtedly leads to the significant growth in health problems gainers. As a result, some suggest governments imposing a maximum tax on these unhealthy snacks. In my perspective, despite the fact that this could be an effective option, other reasonable and practical solutions are required.
To begin with, increasing the tax fee makes the poor unable to afford the food price. Hence, they are forced to cook proper meals on their own, which perfectly supply enough nutrition for their health. On the contrary, this does not respond to affluent consumers. Due to a higher amount of money paid for fast food, the wealthy gradually impose this precooked food as a luxury dish, consequently causing a greater consumption of this kind of food. this means although this method is successful in the low-income citizens, the rich will reverse the situation and even make this increasing number rise more sharply.
Another suggestive recommendation is raising people's awareness, yet, it is still unlikely to be possible. Most people are aware of the harm of junk food, however the usage is still going on because of its convenience. Turning to the root of this problem, people are additive in utilizing unhealthy items on account of its availability. Therefore, the best ways to tackle this alarming problem can be replacing this kind of fast food with some healthy ones, which is both affordable and accessible.
Overall, putting higher tax perhaps be functional in some aspects, notwithstanding, it even has some opposite effects. Thus, making healthier alternatives available and accessible is possibly a more suitable key to this social question.
- The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive and negative development 81
- In the past when students did a university degree they tended to study in their own country Nowadays they have more opportunities to study abroad What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development 73
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...eater consumption of this kind of food. this means although this method is successfu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, kind of, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27675276753 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86537483629 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649446494465 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5666609199 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.142857143 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373990269551 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107353827049 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712378643074 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196535920493 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662154097687 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.