The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graphs highlight information about the percentage of electrical appliances owners and the amount of time that was spent on housework and households in one surveyed country from 1920 to 2019
It is noticeable that there was a significant increase in the percentage of households with Washing machine, Refrigerator and Vacuum cleaner. Especially, the proportion of Vacuum cleaner grew the most.
Looking at the first line graph in more detail, in 1920, no one used the refrigerator while the percentage of owners who had washing machines was the highest, with 40%, as opposed to only 30% for the vacuum cleaner. From 1920 to 1980, the percentage of refrigerators increased considerably to 100% and remained stable after that. In addition, the information of washing machine grew sharply to 70% before decined slightly to 62% in 1980. After that, it went up slightly and reached 75% in the last year. As for the figure of vacuum cleaner ownership, after climbed slowly to 70% in 1970, it overtook that of washing machine and ranked 2nd. Following this, the rate continued to rise and reached its peak at 100% in 2000.
Regarding the second graph, the number of hours for weekly housework went down substantially from 50 hours in 1920 to 10 hours in 2019.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-21 | steveminh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-22 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-21 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 84 | view |
- More and more animal species are becoming extinct by humann activities in land and sea What are the reasons and solutions 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
- The diagram shows the components of a neuron and how it works Sumarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 11
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram shows the components of a neuron and how it works Sumarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, regarding, second, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99056603774 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74985031471 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556603773585 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.6436247444 43.030603864 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.555555556 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146818264439 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499584953332 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773925084475 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120251766682 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133064810283 0.0819641961636 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.