The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart gives information about the main causes which made land become less productive. In addition, the table illustrates the percentaage of land which are affected by these reason in three nations during the 1990s.
It is noticeable that most land are demolished by over - grazing. Moreover, Europe was the area which had the largest part degraded land while the opposite was true for North Amarican.
Looking at the pie chart in more detail, the percentage of land which are became less productive by over- grazing was the highest, ely.compared with deforestation and overcultivation, with 35% and 30%, respectively. In addition, the information of other reason accounted for a small minority, with 7%.
As for the table, Europe was the area which had thehighest proportion of total land degrated, with 23%. In addition, roughly half of that was caused by deforestation. Regarding Oceania, the information of degrated land was 13%, overgrazing accounted for 11.3% while others was made up by deforestation. Finally, the figure of land which are degrated in North Amarica constituted a tiny minority while the mainreason of it was over-cultivation, with 3.3%
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 84
- The diagram shows the components of a neuron and how it works Sumarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...etail, the percentage of land which are became less productive by over- grazing was th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, look, moreover, regarding, so, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31720430108 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11848623373 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559139784946 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1722132859 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179169937143 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864609540751 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916422366955 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140695715443 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137198183448 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...etail, the percentage of land which are became less productive by over- grazing was th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, look, moreover, regarding, so, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31720430108 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11848623373 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559139784946 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1722132859 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179169937143 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864609540751 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916422366955 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140695715443 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137198183448 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.