The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
“Keep it up! You are doing good”. “It is okay if you did wrong, everyone has some bad qualities”. Surely, the second statement doesn’t help anyone. Any appreciation accrues self-confidence in a person, and too much self-confidence is over-confidence. This definitely needs to be balanced by acknowledging the negative traits of the person. While it is true that it is necessary to praise, otherwise self-doubt might reek in, someone who is only praised but not admonished develops the habit of being appreciated wherever they go. They seek validation for whatever they do. Their character becomes fragile and they can’t handle criticism.
The right way to teach somebody cannot be binary, especially in children. People develop their personality from the experiences of their young age. There are children who have been awarded for anything they do and there are other children who are violently beaten by their parents in which the latter believes they are teaching a lesson to their child. The first kind of children go on to become supercilious while the other kind of children become reticent or mendacious. Did it do any good to them? No. The perfect way to teach someone has to be a mix of both worlds. If a person does something wrong, the first step should be to acknowledge it so that the person learns to distinguish good and bad. Post that, explaining why it was wrong and what could be done instead is a better way to deal. A child mirrors what he experiences in his childhood for the rest of his life and violence in the name of teaching will have deleterious effects in the long run.
Definitely, the person who is teaching has to bear great patience while addressing the negative qualities. For adults, this becomes much more important as people tend to repatriate if they realize they are being “criticized”. Yet, one should never skip such a conversation and explain the negative traits politely with a suggestion on how to improve. Again, praising people around us for any good they do helps in keeping things balanced and people become more welcoming towards constructive feedback. Indeed, the best way to teach is to praise the positive actions and address the negative ones politely.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | aaa111 | 33 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, while, as to, kind of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 372.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98655913978 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87674477161 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572580645161 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3968018633 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3181818182 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9090909091 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77272727273 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167589567154 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502830902906 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614637620334 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113623468122 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386083580076 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.