Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is a common belief that all wild animals have the right to be protected. On the contrary, some people think only a few wild animals should have this benefit. In my point of view, I totally agree with this opinion due to several reasons.
To start with, all animals are equal that they have the right to live and have the proficient habitats. From one study of University of Shanghai, China, up to this decade, it is about 70% of animals’ habitat that that are replaced by bulding or houses. Besides that, some houses for species which live in the forests are disappeared because of the deforestation and erosion. This means people are not relizing that their living styles are affecting wildlife animals.
Nevertheless, few wildlife species should benefit from goverment or community conservation because of their devotion to humans. So that they are usually hunted to take for granted. From my experience, elephants are not only well-know with tourisms as one of the entertain transportation but also the certain animals are looked by hunters. It can endanger their population so that protection of animals are raising nowaday. Furthermore, some of species should not be conservated as they are dangers for residents and other animals’ life. Specifically, snakes or corocodides may harm and kill people spontaneously. According to a survey from University of Cincinati, America shows that 89% of students choose not to take careful protection with dangerous animals.
To sum up, both viewpoints have its merits and demerits. However, I totally disagree with the perspective that all wildlife species should be conservated that I have already been mentioned the causes above.
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 80
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 78
- The graph shows the amount of fruit produced in four countries France Spain Germany Turkey from 1970 to 2010
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree
- Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain But other say film should have educational value Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...de, it is about 70% of animals’ habitat that that are replaced by bulding or houses. Besi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... only well-know with tourisms as one of the entertain transportation but also the certain ani...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the species') or simply say ''some species''.
Suggestion: some of the species; some species
...imals are raising nowaday. Furthermore, some of species should not be conservated as they are d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, well, on the contrary, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18315018315 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84105076621 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556776556777 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7286969805 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4375 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300363947687 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934029145945 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880214126086 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182311738359 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976007880739 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.