The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree with this view?
The sources of energy in the natural being exhausted. So somebody is thought the best way to limit the used fuel is to increase the cost of fuel. Personally, I agree with this view but in the circumstance, this solves create a disadvantage for people and could create society negative aspects.
To begin with, increasing money on fuel makes people must save the energy in the natural and likewise in the daily. The fuel is not only oil, coal,... but also the energy in their house. Electricity use is indiscriminate and damages fuel of society. Each the electricity in their house be used reasonable way, that would help their country save energy. Don't use them wasted. For example, many houses usually open the light meanwhile the people don't have to stay home. If the government increase in prices of water, electricity, control,..., the people will limit use them. In addition, with people exploit minerals in the oceans or underground. Nowadays, they more exploit make the fossil fuel being exhausted quickly. So the solve increase money on fuel would suit this instance.
On the other hand, the increase in the cost of fuel could many families still poor, they are not likely to pay for amount of money for them if the equipment in their house, increases price too high. Accordingly, the life of those people will be difficult. Besides, social has many bad people could take advantage of price increasing fuel to exploit illegal then they will offer communication an expensive price.
In conclusion, to solve the world's environmental problems is increasing money of fuel the way most suit. But the countries need to have many methods consistent for the family poorly and have the role to discipline crime exploit energy illegal.
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 61
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Nowadays young people spend too much of their free time in shopping malls Some people fear that this may have negative effects on young people and the society they live in To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think this is a positive or negative development 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...he daily. The fuel is not only oil, coal,... but also the energy in their house. E...
^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Don't
...t would help their country save energy. Dont use them wasted. For example, many hous...
^^^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...lly open the light meanwhile the people dont have to stay home. If the government in...
^^^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...in prices of water, electricity, control,..., the people will limit use them. In a...
^^
Line 3, column 723, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...fossil fuel being exhausted quickly. So the solve increase money on fuel would suit this ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ffer communication an expensive price. In conclusion, to solve the worlds envir...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, if, likewise, so, still, then, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96917808219 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62201541093 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537671232877 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9150012882 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.3684210526 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3684210526 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57894736842 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277298617913 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846264883693 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10155791929 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191473783972 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867386972879 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.95 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.