teachers are more important than facilities
Whether schools should allocate more money to their facilities rather than hiring teachers, has long been the center of public attention. Some people advocate that infrastructure and high-tech equipment can greatly benefit staff and students both, while others hold the opposite opinions, stating that intellects and famous teachers are the true value and spirit of a university. From my perspective, I agree with the latter one.
Firstly, famous teachers and faculty members can establish a flourishing academic environment. As we all know, famous teachers or professors are always innovative and leading roles in a specific field they had dedicated in for years. If schools can invite the best kind of professor to lecture, their attitude and passion for their career will encourage students to model for them. If the school can invite the best kind of professors to project with, their academic resources and achievements can also impact and reinforce the faculty’s performance. All of these traits from the famous teacher will significantly influence the vision and future of a university. None of these could be replaced by machines.
Secondly, a famous teacher can guide students through difficult times. The famous teacher who is successful knows the road to success never goes smoothly. Not only their professional knowledge but also their experiences are very precious to pass through to students. Whether students get stuck or encounter setbacks in their work or life, the teachers who grasp more wisdom in life can lift the spirit. Take me as an example, I always like to consult senior professors for help. Sometimes I will bring some questions about my academic work and other time I will ask my confused things in daily life. I was warmed by the mentorship professors offered, which was like lights in the night. What they said to me sparked my thoughts and give me courage. Therefore, it seems to me, that schools equipped with more cold machines cannot fulfill this gap.
Thirdly, hiring famous teachers can boost enrollment. What are the most important elements you will consider when you are applying to a university? I guess most of us weigh teachers so much over the facilities. Imagine that if you would attend a class lectured by a professor who is a Nobel Prize winner, isn’t that exciting? Imagine that if you would work with a professor who win the championship of Olympic, will you be thrilled to meet them immediately. Conversely, I think without these people the smart tools cannot utilize at their optimal. Therefore, well-known and world-class scholars and teachers will be very compelling. At the moment doing school-selecting, I don’t believe, any students are hesitating if they know they will learn with the most brilliant professor in the field. The glow effect from the famous teachers is the best advertisement for student recruiting. Thus, the university management team should hire famous teachers instead of purchasing equipment.
All in all, regarding the academic environment, guidance, and enrollment, I believe famous teachers are more important than facilities. Therefore, I will advise the university finance more on hiring famous teachers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | prakriti malla | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-17 | Anurag96 | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | fmichela | 76 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, well, while, i guess, i think, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 9.8082437276 245% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2702.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 511.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28767123288 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84133363108 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544031311155 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 809.1 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2036810653 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0666666667 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0333333333 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217638689259 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055145965077 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676622144176 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144528471829 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795152050941 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.