The bar chart shows CO2 emissions for different form of transport in the European union.
The pie chart shows the percentage of europian union funds being spent on different form of transport.
The stipulated bar graph depicts the detail pertaining that CO2 emissions in the European union by variety of transport. Whereas, pie chart evinces the information about how much money europian spent on different forms of transport system.
Overall it can be inferred that air transport used maximum of CO2 emission instead of other one. Europe spent maximum amount of money on roads.
All the fleeting glance, less than 50 gram of CO2 used by coaches and it was minimum. Moreover, buses, maritim and rail used approximately 50g CO2 per passenger. Yet, passenger car used more than 10g of CO2 gas. Around 400g of CO2 was used by air transport system.
Moving toward to the pie chart, only 31% of money spent on railways. Moreover, European spent 52% of their money on roads. About one tenth of money, they spent on public transport. While rest of money, europian spent on intermodal, inland waterways, ports and unknown which was accounted as negligible value.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-16 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 78 | view |
- Human activities have negative effect on plants and animals species Some people say that it is too late to do anything Some people think that we should take effective actions to improve the situation Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The pie chart below show the percentage of five kinds of books sold by a bookseller between 1972 and 2012 10
- The graph below shows the population figures for different type of Tuttles in India from 1980 2012 20
- Today Tv channels broadcast men s sports shows more than women s sport shows Why is this case Should Tv channels give equal showtime for each 67
- The graph gives information about the age of the population of Iceland between 1990 and 2020 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...European union by variety of transport. Whereas, pie chart evinces the information abou...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
... All the fleeting glance, less than 50 gram of CO2 used by coaches and it was mini...
^^^^
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng glance, less than 50 gram of CO2 used by coaches and it was minimum. Moreover,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98757763975 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52146374288 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627329192547 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6631538545 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.9166666667 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.4166666667 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307520435062 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106482196501 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090230896411 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195803581068 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146211657853 0.0819641961636 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 61.2550243902 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.07 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.