Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares USA, Canada and Mexico in terms of the proportion of people using internet from 1999 to 2009.
The given line graph illustrates the rate of people who used the Internet in three specific countries namely American, Canada, and Mexico from 1999 to 2009.
Overall, the proportion of the digital population in each nation witnessed an upward trend over the period. Furthermore, it is clear that a much larger proportion of Americans and Canadians had access to the Internet in comparison with Mexicans. It is also of note that Canada experienced the fastest growth in Internet usage.
At the beginning, the figures for Mexicans accessing the Internet grew slightly before climbing significantly from 10 % to 50% in 2005 but this tendency became slower and finished the period with around 40%.
With respect to the USA, in 1999, 20% of those using the Internet and this figures is likely to more than quadruple by the end of the period shown. With reference to the proportion of people who browse online platforms in Canada, it saw a dramatic upswing, starting in third-place from about 12% and reaching a peak of 100% in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-16 | nttn24905_vkdekutsuki | 89 | view |
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Aui 11
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think it will change in the future Is it good for us to rely so much on computers 84
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think it will change in the future Is it good for us to rely so much on computers 84
- internet users as percentages of population 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... With respect to the USA, in 1999, 20% of people/ those using the Internet and ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, third, with reference to, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97701149425 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66977641806 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632183908046 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2126997911 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.714285714 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270243224712 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11698667769 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863932299862 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163024379074 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982804868511 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.