!Q17 : Some people believe governments should spend money in saving languages of few speakers from dying out completely. Others think this is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recently, the disappearance of minority languages has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that governments should expend money in protecting minority languages, while others argue otherwise. I wholeheartedly agree with the latter stand. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that governments should make a concerted effort to keep minority languages do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that minority languages play an important role in cultural diversities that are invaluable. Another argument is that if it were not for the protection of minority languages, global nations have to invest a vast sum of money in teaching a new language to speakers who use minority languages. Given these points, some people hold the view that languages spoken by a small number of people should be protected.
My opinion, however, is that there are a number of important global issues on which more emphasis should be placed than conserving minority languages given that preserving them is not directly related to people's daily life. Perhaps the most pressing problem which takes precedence over the protection of minority languages is global warming because it takes a heavy toll on people's well-being. To be more specific, a large number of citizens across the globe suffer from global warming which even leads to climate change that exerts a detrimental influence on the quality of life. Another grave issue is global hunger since it is directly related to the life of humans. According to an article released by Seoul Times illustrates that approximately 30% of people in the world died out because of poverty. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that devoting an astronomical amount of money to preserving minority languages is undesirable for the reasons discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-03 | idid382021 | 73 | view |
| 2021-02-04 | @@stranger0122 | 84 | view |
| 2021-02-01 | idid382002 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-01 | Sprios_D | 84 | view |
| 2018-12-07 | lore4129 | 70 | view |
- X 89
- X 89
- Q16 In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Q13 Some people think that success in life comes from hard work and determination while others think that there are more important factors such as money and appearance Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Q5 In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe that the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss b 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... hold the view that languages spoken by a small number of people should be protected. My opini...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...eoples well-being. To be more specific, a large number of citizens across the globe suffer from g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that devoting...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23372781065 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81295607742 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55325443787 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6571680187 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5625 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6875 7.06120827912 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219680022663 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069280268695 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535237423366 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140778687777 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376089311386 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.