20 years cars will be used or less
I believe this statement is true that in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than they are today. There are several reasons I support this statement are explained below.
To begin with, I see that the world is changing gradually, and people on this planet are aware of their environment and resource availability. The cars run on gas and that is nonrenewable and its production is far less than earlier. As people environment lover and knows the consequences that if every member of family drives their car would lead to increase in pollution and people are trying to suppress this consequences, surely this will not prefer to buy cars, so, there is a higher probability that soon there will be less use of cars in future. I feel, instead, people will start using travel buses, this will consume time, money, environment. Apart from good deeds, I feel that this will also be cost-effective. People would like to spend their earnings where they can get back some benefit, not on something where they have to invest more in its maintenance. For example, when I was in school, most of my friend's parents used to drop off their children via car every day, not me but a large number of the population. However so is not happening now, school provides a bus and students travel via bus as this is beneficial from many perspectives. So this is the change which I observe and feel this continuation will lead to less use of cars in upcoming years.
To carry on further, I feel a part of environmental protection, this generation is not that much into cars, they prefer using bicycle and motorcycle. The reason behind this may be bikes are more convenient to use, like easy to park, easy to drive, and low maintenance. The other reason I hold this opinion is, that people nowadays live in a nuclear family where the only couple lives. So they thought of buying a vehicle that is less space occupying and money-saving. One another change I observe is earlier there were taxis, only if a single person has to travel but now there are bike taxis and I feel this is amazingly innovative. People of this era are more health conscious and maintain their specific health, they prefer to ride a bike or bicycle instead of a car.
In conclusion, I look to state that although now the trend of the car is more as the years pass this trend will shift more to use bicycle and bikes because of above-mentioned reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-19 | Uttama Shekhawat | 76 | view |
| 2022-07-19 | Uttama Shekhawat | 80 | view |
| 2022-07-19 | Uttama Shekhawat | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ution and people are trying to suppress this consequences, surely this will not pref...
^^^^
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...hat soon there will be less use of cars in future. I feel, instead, people will start usi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 993, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... children via car every day, not me but a large number of the population. However so is not happe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...though now the trend of the car is more as the years pass this trend will shift mo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, apart from, as to, for example, i feel, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1986.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62937062937 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62444984171 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503496503497 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9729731575 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29118572814 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101283059329 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10256553313 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199990676677 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682961875695 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.