explanations about TLP
The passage presents some potential explanations about the possible source of Transient lunar phenomena (TLP). The lecturer refutes all the arguments in the article, and he claims none of them are plausible. His further demonstrations are as follows.
Firstly, although structural errors in the telescopes might cause the false perception of flashlights, the flashes, in this case, would be present in random places due to the random nature of these defects. If this theiry was true, observers would report flashes corresponding to TLPs at many random places. By contrast, TLP is mostly associated with two specific locations on the surface of the moon. Thus, TLPs cannot be attributed to equipment error.
Secondly, meteor impacts on the lunar surface result in flashes indeed. However, the flashlight caused by a meteor strike only lasts for a second. Oppositely, TLPs last for twenty minutes on average. It is possible that meteor showers should be responsible for some of the TLPs. Nevertheless, most of the TLPs do not happen at the time of meteor showers; so, there must be another explanation present.
Finally, while themoluminescence does happen on Moon and some of its rocks emit their own light, this process cannot be the culprit of TLP. Moon reflects the light from the sun at night, and therefore, it is very bright. The light produced by thermoluminescence is far too weak to be distinguished against this bright background. Hence, the thermoluminescence theory is not likely to be true either.
- powered flight by ptesaurs 81
- TPO05do you agree or disagree with the following statement? people today spend too much time on personal enjoyment - doing things they like to do - rather than doing things they should do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- TPO 40 independent some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade they get in school do you think this is a good idea 73
- TPO 08 agree or disagree: television advertising directed towards young children (age two to five) should not be allowed. 90
- use of TED for saving of turtles 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...eteor showers should be responsible for some of the TLPs. Nevertheless, most of the TLPs do...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 12.0772626932 8% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22540983607 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05288808152 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647540983607 0.540411800872 120% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6734260942 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2666666667 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135049021626 0.272083759551 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411265171114 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961806707451 0.0662205650399 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907395540925 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913062441195 0.0443174109184 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.