The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The chart gives information on the outcome of surveys conducted in an African country conveying teenagers on the principal reasons for using their phones during 2016 and 2019.
Overall, it is prominent that the main reasons for using phones and their porpotion remained unchanged throughout the period: social networks, email, digital camera and phone calls respectively.
The period between 2016 and 2019 witnessed a majority of African teenagers using their phones for social networks, accounting for approximately 50 out of 100 people surveyed. The number of people using their phone mainly for receiving and sending emails accounted for one fourth in 2016, then gradually decrease to 19% in 2016, putting this activity second place in terms of popularity. On the contrary, the trend for using phones to take pictures was upward with the figure remaining unchanged at 15% for the first two years then raised to one fifth in 2019. The least popular feature between 2016 and 2019 was making phone calls. Despite witnessing a small increase of usage from 10% to 13% from 2016 to 2017, the number of African youths using this feature dropped dramatically to 11% then 5% in 2018 and 2019 respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | taman150507 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-21 | pttd.duong@gmail.com | view | |
| 2023-04-21 | pttd.duong@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | Md Mazedul Islam | 73 | view |
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- What are the causes and solutions to higher rates of obesity among children in some countries 89
- The table below shows the proportion of women in the labor force and women in management in five countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 82
- It is more important for students to study Science and Mathematics than it is for them to study History and Literature To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 89
- In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing Could this trend have more positive or negative effects on society 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15306122449 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57492878071 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581632653061 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.5589627003 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.285714286 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391791931174 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197547621367 0.103423049105 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775385880241 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278632238792 0.15604864568 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732084957253 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.