the table below shows information about age, average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in the USA
The table sheds lights on the percentage of people out of the employment age, average individual income and the ratio of those living in poverty in three different areas in The United Nation.
As can be seen from the table, those living in Utal has the least income. Besides, notwithstanding the dominant average individual income, the percentage of California's citizens living in poverty is also the highest.
When it comes to the data for those aged under 18 and those over 60, while California and Utal possess young populations, Florida’s data witnesses the contradictory pattern. Nearly more than a quarter of Utal's population aged under 18 (28%), while there is only 8% inhabitants are older than 60 years old. At the same time, 23% Florida ’s people are in their 60s and above, it is noteworthy that the total percentage of those out of the working age in Florida made up to 39% of its total residents, the highest in three mentioned states.
Considering the average income per person, the first position goes to California with $23000, followed by Florida (22000) and Utal (17000). On the flip side, the amount of income per person does not go in accordance with poverty level, since only 9% of Utal’s residence live below this lines compared to the relatively high percentage of that in California and Florida, 16% and 12% respectively.
- The maps below show a plan of a city in 1950 and at the present Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the disadvantages outweigh the advantages 89
- Some people think children have the freedom to make mistakes while other people believe that adults should prevent children from making mistakes Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate at least five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2002 to 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 276, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... only 9% of Utal’s residence live below this lines compared to the relatively high p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90789473684 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69486404922 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609649122807 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.0757021802 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.875 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206690876506 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085902470274 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663414708168 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125032059588 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071419797281 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.