Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
I mostly agree with the claim that it is not possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero for the stated reason. However, It is presumptuous that the reputation of anyone subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished. Moreover, there are some instances where this media attention could prove fortuitous.
Our Role models are an indispensable part of balanced development of the society and today in the age of media, they are highly accessible to the common people. Their private life is constantly under scrutiny. Media probes into the smallest of the incident in their lives.They are kept on the pedestal overnight and the fame is just ephemeral. The rapid development of mass media has affected the quality of the report coverage about celebrities and role models. This precipitous rise and fall is the reason for the temporary stardom. We can consider the trial of Mr.Johnny Depp vs Amber heard and its mass coverage. It kept both the parties facts out in the open but at the same time subjected both sides to extensive probing and scrutiny resulting an unwarranted media trial. But it will be naïve of us to consider the media scrutiny is only destructive of someone s reputation.
Media scrutiny keeps the transparency intact between those in higher positions and the common people. In the above argument only the reports and news about celebrities and famous personalities are considered. We can consider likes of wealthy people like Elon musk
Whose immense contribution is discussed and disseminated in public forums. Or Mr Mukesh Ambani, whose not only tremendous amount of wealth and successful company are discussed but also is charitable works and contribution towards his country is noted in the media coverage.
Finally whether the media makes or mars someone’s reputation is purely circumstantial, and we as consumers of this media should only make a judgement after careful analysis of the available information. Hence to purport that media scrutiny mars the reputation of a person is an unjustifiable reason to not consider someone as a hero.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 272, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
...smallest of the incident in their lives.They are kept on the pedestal overnight and ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 567, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Johnny
...tardom. We can consider the trial of Mr.Johnny Depp vs Amber heard and its mass covera...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...untry is noted in the media coverage. Finally whether the media makes or mars someone...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... analysis of the available information. Hence to purport that media scrutiny mars the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, however, if, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 345.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09855072464 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89343606716 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568115942029 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.596333378 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.470588235 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05882352941 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2416734517 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757752498085 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969742582542 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139719080617 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138867359589 0.0667264976115 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 272, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
...smallest of the incident in their lives.They are kept on the pedestal overnight and ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 567, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Johnny
...tardom. We can consider the trial of Mr.Johnny Depp vs Amber heard and its mass covera...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...untry is noted in the media coverage. Finally whether the media makes or mars someone...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... analysis of the available information. Hence to purport that media scrutiny mars the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, however, if, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 345.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09855072464 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89343606716 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568115942029 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.596333378 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.470588235 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05882352941 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2416734517 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757752498085 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969742582542 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139719080617 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138867359589 0.0667264976115 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.