The maps show the changes made to a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010
The maps shed lights on how the museum had been transformed during the 20-year period, in 1990 and 2010.
As can be seen from the maps, the area had experienced a significant modification in its overall layout. What is most noticeable is the extension of the parking space and the replacement of some amenities.
Considering the outside space of the museum, time period witnessed the disappearance of the South-East garden with a view to make way for the expansion of the parking area. Along with the garden, the area which used to be a cottage in 1990 had been conversed into a coffee shop.
In terms of the inside facilities, while the entrance and restaurants were kept intact during the mention period, the shop had been widened to the West boundary, hence, sized down the space for the existing exhibition room. The exhibition area in the corner, to the right of the entrance, which was separated as two in 1990 had been merged into one in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-18 | khanhkhanhkhanhkhanhkhanh | 11 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | nhattram39 | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | nhattram39 | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | Hira Shaheen | 11 | view |
- The maps below show a plan of a city in 1950 and at the present Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate at least five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2002 to 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- To succeed in a business one needs to be good at maths To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 1.0 24.0651302605 4% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 1615.20841683 49% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 167.0 315.596192385 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74850299401 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 4.20363070211 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64069819537 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 176.041082164 55% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574850299401 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 506.74238477 47% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3617907605 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.285714286 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120886390579 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601269175012 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657195216581 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861818411451 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695914408623 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 78.4519038076 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.