Everyday, millions of tons food are wasted all over the world. Why do you think this is happening ? An how can we solve this problem.
Many people from around the world abandon millions of tons of food despite the lack of food of many other people in the world. From my perspective, this behavior has been established for many years and it takes a lot of time to deal with it and also the way to tackle this issue will be discussed below.
There are a plethora of reasons that dwellers get rid of their redundant food and it was set up many years ago. First, they think that food is inexpensive and they can purchase it any time with a large number of serves. Some people just buy food as they want, they just pay for a large amount of edibles and just eat a little for tasting and after that abandoning it right after. And the second is they consider that some food that just changes its color a little outside is not edible so they eliminate it. In fact, most households in many nations remove meat because of its appearance. They believe that new fares in the market are better. For instance, a banana that has a small black dot in it will be removed immediately in America.
Wasting meals has been a global issue for many years and if we do not stop it, we will not have anything to maintain our life anymore. Currently, in some slums, food eliminated is found most in many rubbish bags which can be harmful for people who live in slums. To deal with this, the government and food suppliers have to strictly punish eats removing cases. For example, restaurants should give some advice for customers, especially in when leaving too many serves, they must be fined commensurate with the food left. Besides, some kind of food which is easily to be stale need storing in fridge and it can trade with cheaper price for poor.
In conclusion, wasting food is a negative behavior of a number of inhabitants in the world. While food can be easily thrown away instead of stored more carefully and sold with a more affordable price for people who have difficulty.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-04 | unknownabc | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-04 | unknownabc | 53 | view |
| 2022-08-04 | unknownabc | 56 | view |
- To succeed in a business one needs to know math To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 44
- More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas Do you think it is a negative or positive development 79
- One way to solve the problem of congestion on the roads is to increase the tax on private vehicles How could this alleviate congestion 73
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... and they can purchase it any time with a large number of serves. Some people just buy food as th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, second, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50142450142 5.12529762239 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33600166072 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529914529915 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8979545237 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.75 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153196974064 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560313897188 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046330467686 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10839042528 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415198641462 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 12.4159519038 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.