The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014.
Given are two maps delineating the transformations of a residential area running along coastline in Darwin during a phase of 5 years, commencing from 2009 till 2014.
It is perceptible that the region experienced exponential alterations with the elimination of industrial areas as the main feature along with the addition of myriad amenities.
Over the mentioned years, the north of the map seemed barely modified except for the replacement of a swimming pool for the industrial zone which was encircled with a lake by a footpath. Meanwhile, the other amenities such as a conventional center, a school remained unchanged along a curved T-junction lining up from west to east and finishing at a fishing area.
Moving south, the manufacturing area was covered by more trees alongside a footpath after a 5-year renovation which led from the very left lane to the eastern harbor. In addition, three more residential buildings were constructed behind former ones simultaneously with a school to their west.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-06 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | phamkhuyen | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | ThHuong | 87 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | kieutrangkg1 | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, except for, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25465838509 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12497058356 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689440993789 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.4143417778 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 141.0 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11078986417 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522147267792 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550000552585 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0703450885224 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589163508645 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.