Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I support the idea that people who focus on multiple skills can be more successful for reasons that, it can enable them to work on a broader range of topics and to be involved in different communities.
First of all, as far as I could tell from my experience, having different skills enables me to work on entirely different tasks in scientific research, which brings many opportunities. In my process of learning years ago, I tried to familiarize myself with many fields, like Parallel Computing and Computer Graphics. Gradually, I grew a wide range of knowledge. Years later, when I entered my current lab, my professor asked me to choose a field to delve in. Because of my experience in many fields, I have a deeper understanding than other students, which aided me in selecting the field and provided me with a lot more opportunities. Familiar with corresponding knowledge, I can quickly get my hands wet.
Second, if you have multiple skills, you could be involved into different communities thus you can make friends of similar interest. As for me, I want to participate in the communities, which can be comprised of many kinds of people, with completely different educational backgrounds, ages, and even nationalities. Meeting and interacting with those people can broader my horizons of viewing the world. This is not feasible without corresponding knowledge of the field. You can have a good time with the communities only if you have a solid background and things to discuss. With knowledge in different areas, you may have many things to express. You can get into more communities if you want.
From the above, having more skills is quite beneficial in many aspects, that's why I can conclude that one should develop different kinds of skill, fulfilling one's experience, curiosity, and mind. Those are important for one's development in the future.
- An airship is a type of aircraft that flies using a very large balloon filled with a lighter than air gas Airships were an important means of air transportation before the 1940s but are little used today having been largely replaced by airplanes and helic 83
- It is commonly believed that in life success is not the most important thing it is more important to remain happy and optimistic when we fail Do you agree with that idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ls is quite beneficial in many aspects, thats why I can conclude that one should deve...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...op different kinds of skill, fulfilling ones experience, curiosity, and mind. Those ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...sity, and mind. Those are important for ones development in the future.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, thus, as for, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 310.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02258064516 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9832431772 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541935483871 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.891334414 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3125 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252909208039 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803037739594 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06377012493 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170053027258 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564046023985 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.