People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout history, human beings have been perpetually concerned about the ways to succeed. In modern era, hard work and constant effort make a significant contribution to individuals' success. In this regard, the inevitable question which has always caused heated debate among people is that whether those people who have multiple skills can climb the ladder of success, or individuals who just concentrate on a specific skill are more likely to become successful. From my vantage point, developing different skills provides individuals with some opportunities. However, notwithstanding all its advantageous consequences, it can deprive people of achieving success. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The most significant point to be mentioned is that since being a professional in a certain field of study can culminate in more job opportunities, it leads individuals to gain success. In other words, if people focus on one skill to improve, they will become proficient which can open myriad job opportunities for them. Take a personal experience as an example, I used to have a friend who was interested in working with software, so she made effort with improving her skill. Although she had no other sufficient skills to find promising jobs, she was hired by a well-known company. Had not she allocated considerable time to improving her computer skill and spent her time developing multiple skills, she would have not taken advantage of her special capability to be hired.
Another paramount reason which should be referred to is that due to becoming an expert in a certain field is an achievable goal than becoming proficient in various fields, individuals are more likely to attain success when they focus on one skill. Accordingly, a ground-breaking study, which has been conducted recently, revealed that contrary to popular belief being knowledgeable in various domains is implausible. Consequently, in order to become successful people should improve their knowledge in a certain domain.
To recapitulate, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that focusing on one skill to improve plays a pivotal role in individuals’ success than dedicating time to improving different skills, for it not only provides them to be offered well-paid jobs, but also leads them to more probably achieve success. Hence, I recommend that people do their best to become professionals in one skill.
- Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost 76
- People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another 76
- Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use me 80
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, well, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2091.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37532133676 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14558641375 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568123393316 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.7221676704 48.9658058833 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.6875 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3125 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328899302892 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998486176303 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787462612161 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208061657542 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576883012681 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.