The bar chart provides information about how often people in the USA spent ate fast food from 2003 to 2013.
The bar chart illustrates the details of fast food consumption of US citizens in 2003,2006 and 2013. Units are measured in percentage.
Overall, the majority of people in the USA eat fast food once a week and once or twice a week along with that below 5% of people eat fast food daily. Even though, there are below five percent of people are never tried to eat fast food over the given year.
In 2003, about 32% of people eat fast food once a week and the ratio increased to 34% by 2006. While the graph declined to around 28% at the end of the given period. Similarly, the frequency of US residents eating fast food once or twice a month was at the top in 2013 with 34% which was 25% and 30% in 2006 and 2003 respectively.
Regarding the number of people eating fast food several times a week was 20% in 2006 which was below 20% in the other two years. Moreover, 15% of people consume fast food few times a year in 2006 and 2013 which was greater than the year 2003 with 13%.
- The graph below presents the employment patterns in the USA between 1930 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words 73
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think this is a positive or negative development 77
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 56
- Smacking children is the best form of discipline. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 84
- Some people think that the best way to gather information is through newspapers while others believe in other better ways Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...and the ratio increased to 34% by 2006. While the graph declined to around 28% at the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, regarding, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.25531914894 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.12363981979 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489361702128 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6320719534 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8888888889 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271058572353 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127785250486 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879575561746 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188411458293 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342302620521 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.43 11.4140731707 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.