The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton, and planned future development of the site. Summarise the information and report.
The given maps present the changes going to occur in a town called Norbiton in the future.
Overall, the size of the town will remain the same but will go through numerous changes like, installation of shops, school and houses.
First of all, a bridge will be constructed over the river and area under farmland will reduce as some houses will be built on the other side of road emerging from the bridge.
The area around the roundabout will go through significant changes. Shops will be constructed at the south west side, replacing factories and at the north west side, the empty space will be converted into accomodations. In the south eastern side, a medical centre will be installed. At the eastern side of the town, all the factories will be removed and houses will be constructed at its place. School will be constructed at the eastern end of the town and playground on its right front. There will not be any single factory and the population of the town is supposed to grow
- technological progress in the past century has its negative effect despite its remarkable contribution do you agree or disagree 95
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people believe that technology has made man more social To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 95
- The chart below gives information about population growth in three major Australian cities from 1992 to 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 1.00243902439 1297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68965517241 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50398018478 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522988505747 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1478445646 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6666666667 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0598664474514 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398782933735 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395440549151 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0581782307941 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04831478042 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 1.00243902439 1297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68965517241 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50398018478 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522988505747 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1478445646 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6666666667 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0598664474514 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398782933735 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395440549151 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0581782307941 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04831478042 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.