The government's investment in arts, music, and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
It is a common belief in today’s world that the government should prioritize investing in public services over art, music, or theatre so as not to waste money. Personally, I completely disagree with this opinion.
I believe that the government ought to invest even more money in these domains because art in general is an essential part of spiritual people’s life. From my perspective, being absorbed into the genres of music or art that suit our taste is one of the most ideal activities for entertainment. Because that can help us to be happy and relaxed, to unwind after a long day of working or studying. According to science, listening to music can relieve stress and reduce some symptoms of depression as well. For example, people often go to theatres or karaoke to enjoy music and sing on weekends, holidays, or whenever they can. Moreover, a vast majority of people, especially children, prefer painting or drawing pictures in their spare time.
For another reason, I argue that art and music not only benefit us in entertaining but also improve our soft skills and contribute to our inner development. As reported by some researchers, doing activities related to art or music can improve our memories and stimulate our creativity. For instance, art and music have become compulsory subjects in many schools all around the world. In addition, these activities also provide people a chance to connect with our inner world, helping us to understand ourselves inside out and have greater performances in several fields of life.
In conclusion, I stick to my opinion that art and music are irreplaceable parts of our life. Therefore, the government had better raise funds for national art and music development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-16 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
| 2024-04-11 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-07 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-01 | ZAINBM | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | Kaur_Aman | 67 | view |
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of plastics Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05964912281 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83265919958 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621052631579 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.409052803 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265155412935 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908423237233 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101165440506 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196710807835 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122041547888 0.056905535591 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.