Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In this day and age, going directly to college is no longer a popular choice, which is modified with traveling or working for a short period of time. In my opinion, the drawbacks of this trend are overshadowed by its benefits.
On the one hand, a short time of traveling or working may provide people with essential skills. This is because, when they have a chance to go to foreign countries or work with other people, they will soon form plenty of skills such as communication skill, foreign language skill or cooperation skill, etc., which are beneficial for them in college. Another feasible explanation is that doing this in the short term can enable them to relax. A recent research in Britain, by way of illustration, has shown that there are 300,000 people choose to go abroad or work in small firms before going to college with an eye to relieving stress and being more relaxed. Thus, it is clear that the benefits do derive from working and traveling before college.
On the other hand, taking time off to travel or work for a short time can lead to difficulty in acclimatizing. That is because people do this in the short term, and there is little chance for them to acquaint themselves with their new surroundings. As a result, this will trigger boredom, tire, and impatience in them. For example, according to the surveys conducted by Shanghai University, China last year, there were nearly 500,000 youngsters choosing their gap years to work for small companies; however, after a 5-month period, they decided to give up due to the fact that they found it arduous to acclimatize. Through this lens, it is understandable why the aforementioned trend can have some detrimental points.
In conclusion, I believe that taking a year off to travel or work before attending university would be highly advantageous for the young today.
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901
- You bought a TV a week ago but when you got home you discovered it did not work properly You called customer service to report the problem but you have not yet received any help Write a letter to the company and in your letter introduce yourself explain t 73
- You have recently ordered an item through the Internet but are not happy with the purchase Write a letter 100 120 words to the company In your letter describe what you purchased explain why you are not happy with the purchase tell them what you would like 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task You have had a problem with your next door neighbour You have not been able to speak to your neighbour about this Write a letter to this neighbour In your letter Explain the problem Suggest a solution Say wha 64
- People living in large cites today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...d with traveling or working for a short period of time. In my opinion, the drawbacks of this t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent research'.
Suggestion: Recent research
...he short term can enable them to relax. A recent research in Britain, by way of illustration, has...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 5.60731707317 535% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 965.302439024 159% => OK
No of words: 315.0 196.424390244 160% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87619047619 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73721126748 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 106.607317073 167% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565079365079 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 283.868780488 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6567657212 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.153846154 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332240684646 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118666991096 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823537092303 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196340733924 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442315237114 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.