The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart illustrates how many kilometer billions the passengers traveled by 5 types of transporting means from 1990 to 2000.
Overall, there was an increase in the total of traveling kilometer billions by means of transport, which was the result of rises in the kilometers by plane, bus and train. In addition, the number of kilometer billions traveled by bicycle and motorbike saw a decline, making both be the least popular means of transport.
Only 100 kilometer billions were traveled by all of different means of transport in 1990, which saw a significant increase to over 110 kilometer billions after 10-year period. A similar change was seen in the figures for kilometers traveled by train, which started at 40 billions, followed by an increase to around 47 billions.
The number of kilometers traveled by plane and bus experienced the similarly slight increase, which started at around 5 and 45 billions to about 7 and 47 billions in the last year respectively. In contrast, the figures for the passenger kilometers used bicycle and motorbike decreased slightly to approximately 4 and 5 billions in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-24 | hyst12 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-18 | Johndavisvu | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-10 | tranvuongphuongmy | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-10 | tranvuongphuongmy | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-13 | hnhung | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption 73
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below shows population figures for 4 countries for 2003 and projected figures for 2025 and 2050 67
- The pie charts below show the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK University in 1987 and 2007 84
- Many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past Why is that so Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10326086957 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94891424542 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516304347826 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.1271468623 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 134.142857143 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14811846754 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923836773763 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683297751043 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123389107596 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691956662878 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.