technological progress in the past century has its negative effect despite its remarkable contribution. do you agree or disagree
Aside from the convenient life it serves, technological industry has many downsides. I strongly advocate the given statement and the reasons behind my support will be discussed in this essay using examples from my daily life.
Scientific developments have been pushing back the frontiers since the previous century and it has led to cutting edge advances in technology. These developments have made our lives so much easier than before. For instance, we now have convenient access to even remote parts of the world and the advent of internet has completely revolutionised our lives, providing tons of information anywhere in the world. Despite all these pros, technology has also made ourselves so dependent on it that we cannot imagine surviving without it.
Although we are able to get a lot of data about anything which made researching a subject a lot easier, there is also a damage of overloaded information. Addiction to technological advances, like elevators and electric stairs, has led to detrimental effects on our physical health. Many people are working from home nowadays and the rates of people getting obesity has increased over 60% in the past few years, as published in The times of New york in 2020. The cases of cyberbullying has also increased enormously over the time which has led to increased depression among people.
Moreover, modern games invite players to a virtual world of fantasy, including war, which results in severe effects on their brains. This can damage their intellectual skills as well. Our online identities are not secured by privacy and scammers or hackers can steal that from us anytime. One of the first scientific inventions, the nuclear bomb, had resulted in the destruction of mankind in Japan and this can re -happen in future as well due to the creation of deadly weapons. Due to the introduction of machines in manufacturing industries, many workers have lost their jobs which has led to higher number of people living under poverty line. Air, noise and all kind of environmental pollutions have risen enormously in the past few decades.
In conclusion, I am in broad agreement with the claim that technological advances have led to detrimental effects in society, all of which are discussed in the essay.
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information and report 61
- Some people believe that technology has made man more social To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 95
- in some countries owning a home rather than renting one is more important for people Why might this is a case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 78
- Despite a large number of gyms a sedentary lifestyle is gaining popularity in the contemporary world What problems are associated with this What solutions can you suggest 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'damage'.
Suggestion: damage
...g a subject a lot easier, there is also a damage of overloaded information. Addiction to...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11320754717 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87670160476 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592991913747 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6058785183 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.588235294 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8235294118 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0854695218748 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0263624080565 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372345693531 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0452808610986 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214093906192 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Many girls cannot make…
Many girls cannot make arrows in front of their eyes with a decorative pencil, so the only way out is to either contact a makeup artist every day, or get a tattoo and forget about the problem for a long time. When choosing a master, you need to take into account the reputation of the salon, the qualifications of the specialist and his experience. The price in this case also plays an important role. There is no need to chase after the cheapest services, because this often means that the craftsmen use low-quality tools and materials, which can cause undesirable consequences.
The masters here have many years of experience in the beauty industry and annually attend tattoo workshops and conferences. We know everything about permanent makeup and will find a win-win option that will transform your appearance and create a manic image.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'damage'.
Suggestion: damage
...g a subject a lot easier, there is also a damage of overloaded information. Addiction to...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11320754717 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87670160476 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592991913747 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6058785183 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.588235294 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8235294118 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0854695218748 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0263624080565 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372345693531 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0452808610986 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214093906192 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.