The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work.
The maps below illustrate the ground floor plan of a house that is proposed to change.
overall, it is noticed that the internal wall at the same position with storage under the stair was destroyed. While both the entrance door and living room remain unchanged in the new plan.
looking at the existing floor plan, there is a kitchen and a living room that is set on the west and the east of the map. In addition, in the middle of the map is a stair that has storage to contain goods. There is an internal wall put parallel to the hall and stairs, which is linked to an internal door on the north of the map.
Regarding the proposed plan changes, the initial impression is kitchen furniture will be added on the left side of them and at the bottom right corner of the kitchen is two internal doors that it is moved down. Moreover, the internal wall on the right of the stairs will be removed, and re-build a new stair on the top of the flat as well as destructive the storage under the stairs
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-05 | vuhieuquy | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | vuhieuquy | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-22 | Ho Mia | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-24 | jadenguyen | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-24 | jadenguyen | 42 | view |
- The graph below shows the usage of oil in four different countries between 1966 and 2006 as a percentage of total energy use within each nation 82
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems 56
- The chart shows the hours per week spent watching TV by gender and by age group in 2011 in Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparation where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
... a house that is proposed to change. overall, it is noticed that the internal wall a...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Looking
...om remain unchanged in the new plan. looking at the existing floor plan, there is a ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, moreover, regarding, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.32978723404 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22975779581 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489361702128 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3582460439 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.75 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183696073489 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991724639993 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135271497698 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160555738934 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15261695268 0.0819641961636 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.13 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.