The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The diagram illustrates the existing floor management of a particular house as well as a suggested plan for several building works. Overall, there are some differences between 2 plans in the structure.

According to the given data, it is obvious that the kitchen, the living room and two entrance doors are remained. Furthermore, the position of internal doors adjust. In stead of staying near the first entrance door above of the kitchen, they move next to the second one below the leftside internal wall.

Looking closer to the detailed data, a kitchen furniture is added on the left of the kitchen. Besides, the number of internal walls decreases from two in the existing floor plan to one in the suggested plan. Hall is also disappeared, making place for bigger stairs moving to the previous position of internal doors.

In conclusion, the structure of the existing floor plan is a bit different from the proposed changes one although some rooms and entrance stays unchanged.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-04-05 vuhieuquy 56 view
2023-04-04 vuhieuquy 56 view
2023-02-22 Ho Mia 78 view
2022-08-13 vuhieuquy 67 view
2022-07-26 Nguyen Thuy Anh 61 view
Essays by user Ho Mia :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: IN_STEAD_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Instead of'?
Suggestion: Instead of
... the position of internal doors adjust. In stead of staying near the first entrance door ab...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, if, look, second, so, well, in conclusion, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06748466258 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65731293893 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59509202454 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7864007175 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7777777778 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 5.23603664747 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227834502789 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940869660018 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941791221495 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157015253459 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101828415853 0.0819641961636 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.