The maps below show the changes that occurred to a town named Willington in 1780 1860 and 2000

Essay topics:

The maps below show the changes that occurred to a town named Willington in 1780, 1860 and 2000.

The maps illustrate the developments and changes happening in the town of Willington over three different years: 1780, 1860 and 2000.
From an overall view, we can obviously notice that the town went from being green to becoming more built up residentially and commercially.
Back to 1780, the town simply started from four farming spaces on the eastern side of the river. Also, the housing area was made up of two villages with only 100 houses in the north east. The remaning section of Willington was mainly a forest.
In 1860, significant changes were applied in this town, including a bridge between the two sides of the river and a road from the river till the village. The number of farms was considerably lower as it went from 4 to only 2 farms. While the village expanded and more homes were built, the trees area began to shrink in size.
By 2000, the woods were completely wipped out and replaced with a number of school buildings and sport fields linked to the village through a road. Moreover, the housing part of Willington continued to grow larger reaching around 500 homes. Only two more new things were built next to the river; one is a number of shops lying on the southeastern bank, the other is located in the south, namely a waterland for birds.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (24 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-05 nobitaa 78 view
2023-11-28 Tung lam 78 view
2023-11-28 Tung lam 78 view
2022-09-29 celine ayoub 73 view
Essays by user celine ayoub :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trees'' or 'tree's'?
Suggestion: trees'; tree's
...expanded and more homes were built, the trees area began to shrink in size. By 2000...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66964285714 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44765024241 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611607142857 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8204890812 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0909090909 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63636363636 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199196893901 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754102552421 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107983899659 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13163319555 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133894539675 0.0819641961636 163% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.