The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words
The maps depict alterations to the transport infrastructure of a city hospital between 2007 and 2010.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that there were three significant alterations, including intersection upgrades, expanded parking, and improved bus facilities.
Initially, in 2007, the Hospital Road leading to the main facility which had three bus stops on either side, was connected to City Road and Ring Road surrounding the hospital. Located east of Hospital Road was a car park for staff and visitors.
By 2010, the most striking change was the erection of two new roundabouts: one at the T-intersection of Hospital Road and City Road and the other at the four-way junction of Hospital Road and Ring Road. In addition, the existing bus stops were removed to make way for a new bus station located West of Hospital Road with connections to both newly built roundabouts. Finally, regarding parking, a new public car park accessible by Ring Road was established on the eastern side of the hospital, while the old parking lot became a staff-exclusive one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-15 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-15 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | bassmodulators123 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
- What are the causes and solutions to higher rates of obesity among children in some countries 89
- he chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should sp 84
- The maps below show the layouts of nature Museum between 2010 and 2013 73
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in different occupations in one UK town Ashby and in the UK as a whole in 2008 73
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, regarding, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19774011299 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01831366337 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604519774011 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0146383097 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.428571429 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214991063959 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108217064189 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786812178266 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132064133008 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772889010553 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.