At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support
Some people argue that, the importance of sports and classes is same at universities and libraries and they should get equal financial support. However, I disagree with the prompt. I will give two reasons to proof my stance.
To begin with, classes and library should get more financial supports because research works in some courses are very costly to deal with. Such as, perhaps a biomedical engineering student want to do research on cell culture where thousands dollars of instruments are needed. Without these instruments, a student can not undergo a cell culture research and his potential of becoming a great researcher will be diminished. Research works are very important to get a skilled and advanced nation. Funding this sector is beneficial in the long run for a country.
Secondly, funding on sports and classes should not be same in general universities because there are many specialized institutions to learn sports. If a student is very keen to learn the techniques of swimming, he can admit into a swimming institute where whole funding is spent on that particular sport. If a general educational institute like MIT of Caltech do not spend sufficient amount on funding on its classes, libraries and state-of-the-art researches, it will not flourish. These institutions are well renowned for their world class lectures and libraries. It is only possible because they spend a lot of money on improving their classes and libraries.
In conclusion, there should be an optimum ratio of funding for these two sectors. Rather than 50:50, it should be 65:35 for education and sports. This topic is pretty nuanced, but I think that funding more in classes and library is more important than funding in sports and social activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-24 | nidhi78 | 66 | view |
| 2022-06-01 | ReYhan | 81 | view |
| 2022-03-16 | shihhan | view | |
| 2020-07-19 | ehsanyousefzadeh | 63 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | Mazharsaeedbutt | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Money can t buy happiness Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
- Claim Schools should begin teaching students a second language as early as possible 50
- Money can not buy happiness 60
- Technology while apparently aimed to simplify our lives only makes our lives more complicated 50
- At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome people argue that, the importance of sports and classes is same at universiti...
^^
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould get more financial supports because research works in some courses are very ...
^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... classes, libraries and state-of-the-art researches, it will not flourish. These ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, i think, in conclusion, in general, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12280701754 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84207060841 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9401226102 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.25 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247486577822 0.272083759551 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076900966376 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11455794156 0.0662205650399 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168915514836 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962478784091 0.0443174109184 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome people argue that, the importance of sports and classes is same at universiti...
^^
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould get more financial supports because research works in some courses are very ...
^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... classes, libraries and state-of-the-art researches, it will not flourish. These ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, i think, in conclusion, in general, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12280701754 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84207060841 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9401226102 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.25 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247486577822 0.272083759551 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076900966376 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11455794156 0.0662205650399 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168915514836 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962478784091 0.0443174109184 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.