Professors are normally found in university classrooms, offices, and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students. More and more, however, they also appear as guests on television new programs, giving expert commentary on the latest events in the world.
Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage.
The speaker disagrees with describing a professor being on TV as a good thing. From the lecture, the speaker finds it hard to see how a TV publicity does the professor, their school or the public any good.
More significantly, the speaker shows how damaging TV appearances can be to a professor's professional reputation. The more a professor is seen on TV the more unserious they tend to appear to their fellow scholars, leading to less invitation of the professor to important academic events. This can result in less academic progress, lack of funds for research among others for the professor.
Also, TV appearances being bad for the professor puts their school in an unfavourable position as well. The professor's participation a TV program is tied to their school's public outlook as well. Hence, the public's unfavourable representation of the professor is transfer to the school too. A situations like this harms the school's opportunities to get donation from the public.
Ultimately, the speaker sees a professor on TV as benefit no one other than the TV station who uses the privilege to put an academic title on their show while denying the public of the beneficial academic content.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-08 | predatoros | 86 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | KnockingOn | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | daddy | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | daddy | 75 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | John7A7 | 73 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from the marketing director of Top Dog Pet Stores Five years ago Fish Emporium started advertising in the magazine Exotic Pets Monthly Their store saw sales increase by 15 percent If we do so we will be sure to reverse the 59
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard explaining how they cast doubt on points made in the reading 70
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 55
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 77, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a professor' or simply 'professors'?
Suggestion: a professor; professors
...s how damaging TV appearances can be to a professors professional reputation. The more a pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...n an unfavourable position as well. The professors participation a TV program is tied to t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, look, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 12.0772626932 8% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 199.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02902134839 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542713567839 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7106865577 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151265129331 0.272083759551 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729837471 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589124371903 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930711971933 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621816929561 0.0443174109184 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.