In many countries, children are becoming overweight and unhealthy. Some people think that the government should be responsible for solving this problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the prevalence of obesity and health complications among children is increasing at an alarming rate and has become a global and serious issue. Public debate has been going on over whether the government should take full responsibility for this. I completely agree that this is the best way to tackle the issue of deteriorating public health.
Firstly, local governments can take action to prevent childhood obesity because children’s health is more dependent on factors that the government can control. In other words, the government can mandate and implement strong nutritional standards for foods and beverages available in government-run or regulated after-school programs, recreation centers, parks, and child-care facilities. Furthermore, the government can increase penalties on businesses found adulterating food by adding harmful and artificial substances. This method will ensure that children have limited access to unhealthy foods and beverages that negatively impact their health.
Another point to consider is that the government can be involved in encouraging children to pursue more physical activities rather than leading a more sedentary lifestyle. That is to say, governments can guide schools into incorporating more sports classes into the curriculum as well as encourage extracurricular activities. Moreover, it can build and maintain parks and playgrounds that are safe and attractive for playing, and in close proximity to residential areas. As a result, children and their parents will be more motivated to perform physical activities such as playing football or cycling at the park.
Finally, the government can develop media campaigns and utilize platforms including YouTube and television, to promote healthy eating and active living through consistent messages. For example, when kids watch an attractive advertisement or attend campaigns that promote healthier diets, they will start asking their parents to buy them such products.
In conclusion, I would argue that the government plays a major role when it comes to dealing with unfit, overweight children and inactive lifestyles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-12 | minerva | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | baobuicute123 | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-29 | Revivo Tulaseket | 56 | view |
- A big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 11
- Today different types of robots are being developed which can serve as friends help at work and at home Is this a positive or negative development 78
- In the twentieth century contact between different parts of the world has developed rapidly thanks to air travel and telecommunications Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam how true do you think this statement is what measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars 89
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam how true do you think this statement is what measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...safe and attractive for playing, and in close proximity to residential areas. As a result, chil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78343949045 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06958793258 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630573248408 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6650196493 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.714285714 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178582562319 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623813385878 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380741590407 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952209993473 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437896180717 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...safe and attractive for playing, and in close proximity to residential areas. As a result, chil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78343949045 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06958793258 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630573248408 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6650196493 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.714285714 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178582562319 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623813385878 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380741590407 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952209993473 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437896180717 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.