At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.
Do advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In the globalization process, we have witnessed the development from every country leading to a high percentage of population. This would cause a dispute about whether the adolescents who play a more vital role than the seniors in exceeding the country’s population will have a valuable advantage. Although there can be no doubt that the considerable number of young people can be beneficial to society to a certain extent, I hold a belief that this situation will have more merits than the drawbacks.
On the one hand, there are compelling rationale to embrace that the population with numerous juveniles brings merit. The most justifiable explanation is that the development in an industrial country nowadays hinges on the young labor. This is because the intelligentsias are predominantly composed of people in the young ages. This could be perfectly exemplified that according to a recent research, the proportion of the young people is mainly responsible for 70% of a country’s labor force. As a result, the future of a nation is seen to be depended upon the fellow millennials.
On the other hand, the perspective on the drawback of a myriad of juveniles in the national population is given a legitimate explanation . One of the most considerable justification is that the attitude of the youth towards the seniors is anticipated to be worse than before. This could be explained that young people will only be subordinate and submissive to their leader, in lieu of the seniors. As a result, the elderly people might constantly be disrespectful by the young people’s behaviors, especially when the representatives of both distinct generations get to work with each other in the office.
In conclusion, this trend might possess many benefits and drawbacks. However, I am more inclined to the view that the advantages will likely prevail. Therefore, I suggest that the government or the parliament of a country should take an action to reform the draft or the resolution in terms of harmonizing the seniors and the adolescents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-19 | phuongnguyen1234 | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-18 | phuongnguyen1234 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-31 | ichaaurora | 67 | view |
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 67
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 56
- Some people think that large impressive buildings are important for a city Others believe that the money should be spent on improving schools and hospitals Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to a recent research, the proportion of the young people is mainly responsible f...
^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...lation is given a legitimate explanation . One of the most considerable justificat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1656626506 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16707351967 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524096385542 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.141112127 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149138206771 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472538460446 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313430981646 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867045877917 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314715006704 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.