Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both view and give your opinion
In the globalization process, the careers that have high level skills are tremendously required in a myriad of labor forces in many countries. This would cause a dispute whether professionals should be placed in the country where they spend most of their time training and studying. Although there are scores of people tending to approve this idea, I am of the opinion that the desire to devote their working competence in other countries should be supported.
On the one hand, the option to support people who want to work in another country is appealing for several rationales. The most considerable justification is that they will represent for the nation humanitarian for protecting human’s rights. This could be explained by the fact that the country with the ideology of socialism which includes the protection of human rights in the content of the constitution is highly appreciated. As a result, if a country forbids their citizens to work abroad, this could be stated for that country’s weakness of legislation. Another sustainable explanation is that the numerous professionals spending time working in foreign countries will create a higher education for their country. This is because when working in a different condition, their skills and knowledge would be broadened. Therefore, when they return to their homeland, they will utilize what they have consumed and transmit to their students if they wish.
On the other hand, there is an exposition to condemn that people having high level skills jobs should stay in their country to devote their knowledge for the country's development. This is essential for every country in the world to have intelligentsia in the labor forces, especially when it comes to professionals such as doctors or engineers. For instance, according to recent research, a country with 70% of professionals predominantly will have a booming economy.
In conclusion, while there are many benefits of disapproving professionals to working in another country, I still believe that it is more beneficial to appreciate and support professionals for working abroad due to the benefits that they could bring. It is advisable that people acknowledge the essential contribution of advertisement and to learn how to utilize the advantage of it effectively.
- Some people think that large impressive buildings are important for a city Others believe that the money should be spent on improving schools and hospitals Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The maps show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 84
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 84
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 957, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ransmit to their students if they wish. On the other hand, there is an expositio...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the world to have intelligentsia in the labor forces, especially when it comes t...
^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve a booming economy. In conclusion, while there are many benefits of disappr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1939.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34159779614 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0717081114 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493112947658 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7021007785 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.266666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40775710189 0.244688304435 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136300595305 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808029789418 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245018262611 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719158012851 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.