In recent years, pressure on school and university students has been increasing and they are pushed to work very hard from a young age. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, stress on school and education student has been increasing and they are always work hard from a teenagers age. This essay will examine both sides of the arguments before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of students have pressure school and work hard. First, in this modern life is very development and increasing education conditions and government education enhancement are believed to equalize educational opportunities among young adolescents regardless of their background. This increasing education and students work hard support, presumably tends not only to increase the overall college enrollment rate of lower-income people but also to mitigate number of poor students, which eventually promotes a knowledge society. Second, students work hard would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and knowledgeable human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problem would be far more significant than the minor benefits once students work very hard from young age. First, students work hard and have pressure school would likely correspond with a tremendous healthy strain on a country. Just focused on homework and willing to stay up at night or in the morning to do homework, students could become health loss and lack of vitality in other things, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as expand relationships and take care themselves. Second, students work very hard and authorities reform to increase the difficulty of education would make young people want I dropping out or show no interest college pursuits, thereby great burdens for university admissions and university staff and potentially they can have free time for themselves can open their mind or heart and spent pursuing more suitable time for working. It, instead, would be a more study viable option if the resources were focused on supporting their health.
I was discussed both sides of the argument about positive and negative. In my perspective, this argument have negative development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-02 | Trần Ánh Vy | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-07 | justkate | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-07 | justkate | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | helloxjsky | 82 | view |
- Society is based on rules and laws It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- In recent years pressure on school and university students has been increasing and they are pushed to work very hard from a young age Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- The graph below show gives information about the price of bananas in four different countries between 1994 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below show the percentage of time working adults spent on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below gives information about different types of in one country in 1960 and 2011 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47398843931 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87296030234 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612716763006 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.9823111869 49.4020404114 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.285714286 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349459572629 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115334826709 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879603240198 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200328688438 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707387085389 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.