We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.
People typically feel comfortable when they are around with others who bear similar personalities with them. On the other hand, they feel discomfited when surrounded by those whose views are incompatible with or even contradict with their own stances. Regarding this matter, the given prompt contends that people can attain lessons from people with similar views than those with opposite views. I mostly disagree with this argument for two reasons, but I do concede that people can reinforce their strengths by sharing similar views from others.
First of all, people can broaden their perspectives by sharing contrasting viewpoints from those with opposite stances. Specifically, they can expose themselves with new and unusual ideas that cannot be shared when discussing with people with similar viewpoints, which help people to think in a various point of view. Consequently, this widen perspective may play a significant role in one’s growth in career or interpersonal skills. For instance, in the mid-19th Century, Japan was able to accomplish an exponential growth in its economy due to its openness to new and even contradictory ideas and technologies from the Western civilization. To elaborate, Japan was able to implement mass production and capitalism in its society, which resulted in dramatically increased efficiency in circulation and economic growth. Were it not for the willingness and tolerance of the Japan toward unusual and novel technologies and products from the Netherlands, Japan could have not accomplished to attain hegemony at that era. This example shows that accepting and sharing contrasting ideas from others can help achieve a considerable national growth. Similarly, this applies to people, too. If people are willing to share thoughts that may go against one’s convention, they are highly likely to accept various perspectives and utilize them for personal growth.
Secondly, sharing contradictory perspectives with others aids people to improve on their weaknesses or overlooked aspects. Specifically, those contrasting viewpoints force people to view their own perspectives objectively, which enables them to look for overlooked areas or prejudices. By fixing these vulnerabilities, people can make enhancement on their views. For instance, suppose that there is a man who believes that hardworking is the primary virtue to which people should adhere. He may feel obsessed with finishing all tasks in time and perfectly, which makes him intensely stressful. However, if he has an opportunity to meet with someone who thinks that managing stress and maintaining composure is a key to achieving one’s goal, he is more likely to adjust his previous viewpoint to have more relax than when he does not meet this person. He may also realize that his belief system was somewhat flawed and was detrimental to one’s mental health and happiness. This hypothetical example presents that sharing and accepting opposite viewpoints offer an opportunity for people to discover their weaknesses or biases, help them fix those problems, and make improvements.
It is true that sharing similar views help people to focus more on their strengths. However, in this situation, they are susceptible to falling into false impression about their strengths. They are more likely to be influenced by prejudices and biases that hinder them to make genuine enhancements in regard to their perspectives. Furthermore, they are more likely to become complacent with the current status than when they share contradictory views with others and focus on weaknesses.
In conclusion, since people can widen their viewpoints and make improvements by focusing on weaknesses, sharing contradictory views with others is better for one’s personal growth than sharing similar views. Even if it might be the case that sharing similar perspectives induce people to focus on their strengths, they are prone to experience drawbacks, such as falling into false impression of making a true personal growth and being subjected to partiality and complacency. Hence, people should try to expose themselves with contrasting viewpoints in order to make improvements in their lives although this may be uncomfortable.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-12-26 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
2023-12-26 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
2023-12-15 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
2023-12-14 | Mirza Raquib | 54 | view |
2023-10-28 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 75
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues Over the past year the Crust Copper Company CCC has purchased over 10 000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia Mining copper on this land will in 73
- Some people believe that the ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another 66
- Scinetists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people 66
- We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in regard to, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 28.0 11.3162921348 247% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 74.0 33.0505617978 224% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 97.0 58.6224719101 165% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3569.0 2235.4752809 160% => OK
No of words: 648.0 442.535393258 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50771604938 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.04537849152 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00153289535 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 296.0 215.323595506 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456790123457 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1079.1 704.065955056 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 6.24550561798 272% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5541497568 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.464285714 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.67857142857 5.21951772744 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 10.2758426966 204% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250304426401 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082657345476 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709403890523 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164268837618 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489571558792 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 163.0 100.480337079 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.