Which of the following activities do you think will be the most beneficial to the environment? (1) Commute by biking or walking (2) Recycling (3) Eating a vegan diet
Some people argue that commute by biking or walking might not benefit the environment as it could be seen as a minute problem in front of many hazardous activities. However, I disagree with this stance for the following three reasons.
First of all, people are more likely to not consider the seriousness of the effect on the environment of vehicles as it is seen as a daily necessity. With the increase in population transportation requirement also increases as more and more people are willing to travel to their required destination which makes people rely on vehicles. For example, A person living far away from his work would more likely need any kind of transport to reach his office in time. In addition, vehicles have also become inexpensive, so more people are willing to afford to purchase a vehicle which increases the amount releasing harmful gases in the air.
Second of all, Vehicles that run on batteries might be seen as an alternative but even making these batteries would indirectly affect the environment. For example, making batteries require a large number of ores which are found in caves, these ores play a key role in the ecosystem but extensive mining of them could result in damage to the environment. Even though alternative methods for making batteries without the use of these ores are being researched but these usually take more time to fully develop, So by relying on biking or walking could minimize the damage being done to the environment.
Finally, By using biking or walking increases human overall health as these require physical activity which increases blood circulation and concentration. For example, a person relying on driving is more likely to get less physical exercise and with an increase in time would likely be more lethargic and have more health problems, Although some people using vehicles exercise daily and maintain good health without the use of biking or walking, the number of people following this routine is minute.
In conclusion, using biking or walking for transportation would only benefit the environment as it does not cause any activities which would damage the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-06 | Vincent Samuel | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | Naveena0 | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | Vincent Samuel | 63 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | Naveena0 | 70 | view |
| 2022-08-08 | kevinkwon | 73 | view |
- The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim 50
- The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine In 1975 a wildlife census found that there were seven species of amphibians in Xanadu National Park with abundant numbers of each species However in 2002 only four species of amphibians 60
- Which of the following activities do you think will be the most beneficial to the environment 1 Commute by biking or walking 2 Recycling 3 Eating a vegan diet 73
- The following is a letter that recently appeared in the Oak City Gazette a local newspaper The primary function of the Committee for a Better Oak City is to advise the city government on how to make the best use of the city s limited budget However at som 60
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men an 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
.... For example, making batteries require a large number of ores which are found in caves, these or...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, second, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10481586402 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.739776623 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467422096317 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 589.5 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.8422765897 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.166666667 100.406767564 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4166666667 20.6045352989 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 5.45110844103 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151664986811 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670902832772 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506684442109 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106534700323 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429754861684 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 11.7677419355 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 58.1214874552 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.