Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.
I strongly keep disagreement with the statement that mentions young people today do not have influence on important future determining decisions with several reasons. In fact youngsters are much aware and give respect to the impact creating important decisions in their life. Some reasons that bolster with my statement are mentioned below.
For the first reason, young people are much cognitive of their imminent future. Most proportion of young people because of worry of near future keep desire for quality study from inception of adult phage through out the phase. For instance, report shows the largest group of people who make long life journey for the betterment of their future in pursue of higher study or with an immense inner desire to earn for their family. Not only this, we can see a large group of young people, because of worry towards important future events, travel overseas for sport event or with expectation of possible earnings. I do not think if they do not have any influence of important decisions, they would be ready to leave their beloved home as well as parents away temporarily.
For the second reason, youngsters are always aware of their economic aspects. As this world is swiftly striding towards development on every realms like technology, social sites and internet, large group of teenagers are engaged in online games, developing online applications making every posible way earning to ultimately bolster their family lives. I do not think that such young people are not only taking frivolou entertainment, not only squandering ineffably precious time, but also generating income side by side. Nobody wants to spoil their life intentionally. For example I have seen teenagers around my village spending their whole day in an expectation to make hand and mouth joining. Who does not want to make their future be majestic one? Do not they take care of the influence of such decisions in their life?
In sum, teenagers are the group of people who from young age start struggling, following and chasing dreams with genuine intention to make their life better.
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole 80
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole 76
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole 76
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sc 76
- It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 95
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 204, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...ity study from inception of adult phage through out the phase. For instance, report shows t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, well, as for, for example, for instance, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 344.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09302325581 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55749859835 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561046511628 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4988377988 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240822815063 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827794832853 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926933584817 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159213926203 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892738110101 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 204, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...ity study from inception of adult phage through out the phase. For instance, report shows t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, well, as for, for example, for instance, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 344.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09302325581 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55749859835 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561046511628 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4988377988 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240822815063 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827794832853 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926933584817 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159213926203 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892738110101 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.