The price of 800 grams of four kinds of bread in a particular European country
The graph illustrates the cost per 800 grams of four categories of bread in a particular European nation over five consecutive years, starting from 2001. The unit was measured in euros.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the figure for brown, rye, and white bread, while the price of wholegrain experienced dramatic fluctuations over the given period. Additionally, brown bread became the most exorbitant at the end of the interval.
As can be seen from the graph, wholegrain bread was 0.8 euros in 2001, then it reached its pinnacle in 2002. Afterward, it saw a slump by 0.8 over the three following years before making a slight recovery at the end of the period.
Regarding brown bread, 0.6 was registered in 2001, after which it moved in parallel with wholegrain bread, recording 1.5 in 2002. In 2005, the price of brown bread was 1.6 euros after experiencing a mild rise.
Concerning white bread, it witnessed a twofold rise between 2001 and 2004, before culminating at 1.1 in 2005.
Over the period, the price of rye bread saw insignificant movements, becoming the most reasonable bread in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-25 | lethianhthu | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-13 | tieuquynh | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | ililmaidatuz | 80 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | ililmaidatuz | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | hien3112 | 78 | view |
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy 70
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in an European country betwwwn 1999 to 2004 78
- The maps show the changes of an office building between the present and the future 73
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7001799947 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593582887701 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1429670328 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232238932548 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905161400003 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856162841245 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122126683409 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080212003686 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.