In recent years, there is a trend of ‘responsible tourism’, which pays attention to both local culture and the environment. However, there are still people who think that ‘responsible tourism’ is impossible to implement in reality. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary society, there is a tendency for people to travel overseas with a concern for the local cultural and environmental values of the destination country or ‘responsible tourism’. Nevertheless, a school of thought argues that this type of tourism cannot be applied realistically. From my perspective, I disagree entirely with the statement.
It is indisputable that the implementation of responsible tourism into society is an uphill struggle. The key rationale is that tourists may not have good behaviours towards the people and local surroundings. As a consequence, not only is the regional environment devastated but also the people will have a bad impression of foreign tourists. However, this situation could be alleviated by educating those citizens on the method to preserve local habitats before the trip. For example, they could be instructed not to litter disorderly in reservation areas. With this approach, they could visit the destination country with respect for the provincial people and habitat.
Similar to the above-mentioned phenomenon, to encounter the fact that several individuals criticize and treat cultural and religious attractions poorly, some solutions could be implemented. First, it is necessary to teach tourists the rules and restrictions of those spots before excursions or long-term travels. For instance, travellers could be educated on the use of appropriate clothes during a visit to pagodas or mosques. Therefore, citizens might have an adequate amount of information to prepare for inspections of religious and cultural attractions. In addition, residents could also be invited to go to presentations about the cultural history of the region to acquire a reasonable amount of information about their upcoming destinations. Having this activity will help them understand and respect the provincial culture more so that they would attempt not to harm the culture by any means.
In conclusion, I hold a firm belief that while there are numerous struggles in order to bring responsible tourism into real life like overseas tourists’ lack of awareness of the provincial environment and culture, such measures could be applied to tackle the issue, in which the instructions on how to protect the environment and culture is effective to deal with the problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-18 | TROLLFACENOOB | 77 | view |
- Any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government Do you agree or disagree 61
- As machines have become more sophisticated more and more jobs and tasks involving physical hard work can be done automatically Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects 89
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 84
- In some countries schools are teaching English to primary school children Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1966.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53802816901 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22959435633 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557746478873 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.8292125027 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.875 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1875 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153043018677 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501990673408 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564962910474 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108523742923 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408110182747 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.